Greenshoe (Ofer Abarbanel online library)

Formally known as an “over-allotment option”, a greenshoe is the term commonly used to describe a special arrangement in a share offering, for example an initial public offering (IPO), which enables the investment bank representing the underwriters to support the share price after the offering without putting their own capital at risk. The option is codified as a provision in the underwriting agreement between the leading underwriter – the lead manager – and the issuer (in the case of primary shares) or vendor (secondary shares).[1]

The term is derived from the name of the first company, Green Shoe Manufacturing (now called Stride Rite Corporation), to permit underwriters to use this practice in an IPO.[2]

The use of greenshoe options in share offerings is now widespread, for two reasons: it is a legal mechanism for an underwriter to stabilize the price of new shares, which reduces the risk of their trading below the offer price in the immediate aftermath of an offer – an outcome damaging to the commercial reputation of both issuer and underwriter. Secondly, it grants the underwriters some flexibility in setting the final size of the offer based on post-offer demand for the shares.

Underwriter short-selling and price stabilization

Greenshoe option

The greenshoe option provides stability and liquidity to a public offering. As an example, a company intends to sell one million shares of its stock in a public offering through an investment banking firm (or group of firms, known as the syndicate) which the company has chosen to be the offering’s underwriters. Stock offered for public trading for the first time is called an initial public offering (IPO). Stock that is already trading publicly, when a company is selling more of its non-publicly traded stock, is called a follow-on or secondary offering.

The underwriters function as the brokers of these shares and find buyers among their clients. A price for the shares is determined by agreement between the company and the buyers. When shares begin trading in a public market, the lead underwriter is responsible for helping to ensure that the shares trade at or above the offering price.

When a public offering trades below its offering price, the offering is said to have “broke issue” or “broke syndicate bid”. This creates the perception of an unstable or undesirable offering, which can lead to further selling and hesitant buying of the shares. To manage this situation, the underwriters initially oversell (“short”) the offering to clients by an additional 15% of the offering size (in this example, 1.15 million shares). When the offering is priced and those 1.15 million shares are “effective” (become eligible for public trading), the underwriters are able to support and stabilize the offering price bid (also known as the “syndicate bid”) by buying back the extra 15% of shares (150,000 shares in this example) in the market at or below the offer price. The underwriters can do this without the market risk of being “long” this extra 15% of shares in their own account, as they are simply “covering” (closing out) their short position.

When the offering is successful, demand for shares causes the price of the stock to rise and remain above the offering price. If the underwriters were to close their short position by purchasing shares in the open market, they would incur a loss by purchasing shares at a higher price than the price at which they sold them short.

The greenshoe (over-allotment) option would now come into play. The company had initially granted the underwriters the option to purchase from the company up to 15% more shares than the original offering size at the original offering price. By exercising their greenshoe option, the underwriters are able to close their short position by purchasing shares at the same price for which they short-sold the shares, so the underwriters do not lose money.

If the underwriters are able to buy back all of the oversold shares at or below the offering price (to support the stock price), then they would not need to exercise any portion of their greenshoe option. If they are able to buy back only some of the shares at or below the offer price (because the stock eventually rises higher than the offer price), then the underwriters would exercise a portion of greenshoe option to cover their remaining short position. If the underwriters were not able to buy back any portion of the oversold shares at or below the offering price (“syndicate bid”) because the stock immediately rose and stayed up, then they would completely cover their 15% short position by exercising 100% of their greenshoe option.

SEC regulations

The SEC permits the underwriters to engage in naked short sales of the offering. The underwriters create a naked short position either by selling short more shares than the amount stated in the greenshoe option, or by selling short shares where there is no greenshoe option. It is theoretically possible for the underwriters to naked short sell a large percentage of the offering.[3] The SEC also permits the underwriting syndicate to place stabilizing bids on the stock in the aftermarket.[4] However, underwriters of initial and follow-on offerings in the United States rarely use stabilizing bids to stabilize new issues. Instead, they engage in short selling the offering and purchasing in the aftermarket to stabilize new offerings. “Recently, the SEC staff has learned that in the US, syndicate covering transactions have replaced (in terms of frequency of use) stabilization as a means to support post-offering market prices. Syndicate covering transactions may be preferred by managing underwriters primarily because they are not subject to the price and other conditions that apply to stabilization.”[5]

Naked short selling and syndicate covering purchases

The only option the underwriting syndicate has for closing a naked short position is to purchase shares in the aftermarket. Unlike shares sold short related to the greenshoe option, the underwriting syndicate risks losing money by engaging in naked short sales. If the offering is popular and the price rises above the original offering price, the syndicate may have no choice but to close a naked short position by purchasing shares in the aftermarket at a price higher than that for which they had sold the shares. On the other hand, if the price of the offering falls below the original offer price, a naked short position gives the syndicate greater power to exert upward pressure on the issue than the greenshoe option alone, and this position then becomes profitable to the underwriting syndicate.[3]

Risk to investors

The underwriters’ ability to stabilize a stock’s price is finite both in terms of the number of shares the underwriters short-sold, and the length of time over which they choose to close their positions. “Regulation M defines this type of share repurchase as a syndicate covering transaction and imposes the same disclosure requirements as those imposed on penalty bids. Consequently, investors need not be informed that an offering is, or will be, stabilized by way of a syndicate short position. Rather, investors need only be exposed to language indicating that ‘the underwriter may effect stabilizing transactions in connection with an offering of securities’ and a characterization of possible stabilization practices in the ‘plan of distribution’ section of the prospectus.”[6]

The SEC currently does not require that underwriters publicly report their short positions or short-covering transactions. Investors who are unwary of underwriter stabilizing activity who choose to invest in what they perceive to be a stable issue can encounter volatility when the underwriters pause or complete any stabilizing activity. “Cast in the most negative light, price stabilization might be seen as a means of transferring risk to a relatively naïve segment of the investor population.”[7]


  1. ^Martin, Alexander, “Line Raises IPO Price Range to Meet Strong Demand” Wall Street Journal, July 4, 2016. Retrieved 2016-07-04.
  2. ^“Company history”. Stride Rite. Stride Rite Children’s Group LLC. 2012. Archived from the original on 27 May 2012. Retrieved 21 May 2012.
  3. ^ Jump up to:ab “Excerpt from Current Issues and Rulemaking Projects Outline (November 14, 2000)”. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 14 November 2000. Retrieved 16 September 2012.
  4. ^“Regulation M, Rule 104”. University of Cincinnati, College of Law. Archived from the original on November 16, 2011.
  5. ^Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (January 11, 2005). Securities Law Update (PDF): 2 Missing or empty |title= (help)[dead link]
  6. ^Wilhelm Jr., William (1999). Secondary Market Price Stabilization of Initial Public Offerings. Chestnut Hill, MA 02167: Wallace E. Carroll School of Management. p. 3.
  7. ^Wilhelm Jr., William (1999). Secondary Market Price Stabilization of Initial Public Offerings. Chestnut Hill, MA 02167: Wallace E. Carroll School of Management. p. 4.


Ofer Abarbanel online library