Autarky (Ofer Abarbanel online library)

Autarky is the characteristic of self-sufficiency; the term usually applies to political states or to their economic systems. Autarky exists whenever an entity survives or continues its activities without external assistance or international trade.

If a self-sufficient economy also refuses to conduct any trade with the outside world then economists may term it a “closed economy“.[1] (Economic theorists also use the term “closed economy” technically as an abstraction to allow consideration of a single economy without taking foreign trade into account – i.e. as the antonym of “open economy”.) Autarky in the political sense is not necessarily an exclusively economic phenomenon; for example, a military autarky would be a state that could defend itself without help from another country, or could manufacture all of its weapons without any imports from the outside world.

Autarky as an ideal or method has been embraced by a wide range of political ideologies and movements, especially left-wing creeds like African socialism, mutualism, war communism,[2] council communism, Swadeshi, syndicalism (especially anarcho-syndicalism) and leftist populism, generally in an effort to build alternative economic structures or to control resources against structures a particular movement views as hostile. Conservative, centrist and nationalist movements (such as in the American system, Juche, mercantilism,[3] the Meiji Restoration, social corporatism, and traditionalist conservatism) have also adopted autarky in temporary, limited ways – usually in an attempt to preserve part of an existing social order or to develop a particular industry. Fascist and far-right movements occasionally claimed to strive for autarky in platforms or in propaganda, but in practice crushed[4] existing movements[5] towards self-sufficiency and established extensive capital connections which served as a basis for expansionist war and/or genocide[6] while allying with traditional business elites.[7]

Autarky may be a policy of a state or other entity when it seeks to be self-sufficient as a whole, but also can be limited to a narrow field such as possession of a key raw material. For example, many countries have a policy of autarky with respect to foodstuffs[8] and water for national-security reasons. By contrast, autarky can result from economic isolation or from external circumstances in which a state or other entity reverts to localized production when it lacks currency or excess production to trade with the outside world.[9][10]


The word autarky is from the Greek: αὐτάρκεια, which means “self-sufficiency” (derived from αὐτο-, “self”, and ἀρκέω, “to suffice”). The term is sometimes confused with autocracy (Greek: αὐτoκρατία “government by single absolute ruler”) or autarchy (Greek: αὐταρχία – the idea of rejecting government and ruling oneself and no other).


Ancient and medieval

Early state societies that can be regarded as autarkic include nomadic pastoralism and palace economy, though over time these tend towards becoming less self-sufficient and more interconnected. The late Bronze Age, for example, saw formerly self-sufficient palace economies rely more heavily on trade, which may have been a contributing factor to the eventual Bronze Age Collapse when multiple crises hit those systems at once. After that collapse, the ideal of autarkeia formed a part of emerging Greek political culture, emphasizing economic self-sufficiency[11] and local self-rule.

Medieval communes combined an attempt at overall economic self-sufficiency through the use of common lands and resources with the use of mutual defense pacts, neighborhood assemblies and organized militias to preserve local autonomy[12] against the depredations of the local nobility. Many of these communes later became trading powers such as the Hanseatic League. In some cases, communal village economies maintained their own debt system[13] as part of a self-sufficient economy and to avoid reliance on possibly hostile aristocratic or business interests.

While rarer among imperial states, some autarkies did occur during specific time periods. The Ming dynasty, during its later, more isolationist period, kept a closed economy that prohibited outside trade and focused on centralized distribution of goods produced in a localized farms and workshops.[14] A hierarchy of bureaucrats would oversee[15] the distribution of these resources from central depots, including a massive one located in the Forbidden City. That depot was, at the time, the largest logistical base in the world.

19th and early 20th centuries

In some areas of the antebellum South, the enslaved and free black populations forged self-sufficient economies in an effort to avoid reliance on the larger economy controlled by the planter aristocracy. In eastern North Carolina maroon communities, often based in swampy areas, used a combination of agriculture and fishing to forge a “hidden economy” and secure survival.[16] The relative self-reliance of these maritime African-American populations provided the basis for a strongly abolitionist political culture[17] that made increasingly radical demands after the start of the Civil War. Due to tense relations with some Union commanders and political factions during and after that war, these communities “focused their organizing efforts on developing their own institutions, their own sense of self-reliance, and their own political strength.”[18]

Autarkic ambitions[19] can also be seen in the Populist backlash to the exploitations of free trade in the late 19th-century and in many early Utopian Socialist movements. Mutual aid societies like the Grange and Sovereigns of Industry attempted to set up self-sufficient economies (with varying degrees of success) in an effort to be less dependent on what they saw as an exploitative economic system and to generate more power to push for reforms.

Early socialist movements used these autarkic efforts to build their base with institutions like the Bourse de travail, socialist canteens and food assistance. These played a major role in securing workers’ loyalty and building those parties into increasingly powerful institutions (especially in Europe) throughout the late 19th and early 20th-centuries. Through these cooperatives[20] “workers bought Socialist bread and Socialist shoes, drank Socialist beer, arranged for Socialist vacations and obtained a Socialist education.”

Local and regional farming autarkies in many areas of Africa and Southeast Asia were displaced[21] by European colonial administrations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, who sought to push smallholder villages into larger plantations that, while less productive, they could more easily control.

Communist movements embraced or dismissed autarky as a goal at different times. In her survey of anarchism in the late 1800s, Voltairine De Cleyre summarized[22] the autarkic goals of early anarchist socialists and communists as “small, independent, self-resourceful, freely-operating communes.” Some socialist communities like Charles Fourier’s phalansteres strove for self-sufficiency. The early USSR in the Russian Civil War strove for a self-sufficient economy[23] with War Communism, but later pursued international trade vigorously under the New Economic Policy. However, while the Soviet government during the latter period encouraged international trade, it also permitted and even encouraged[24] local autarkies in many peasant villages.

Sometimes leftist groups clashed over autarkic projects. During the Spanish Civil War, the anarcho-syndicalist CNT and the socialist UGT had created economic cooperatives in the Levante that they claimed[25] were “managing the economic life of the region independent of the government.” But communist factions responded by cracking down on these cooperatives in an attempt to place economic control back in the hands of the central government.

Right-wing totalitarian governments that have claimed to strive for autarky have often pursued a very different policy in fact, just as some claimed to be in favor of socialism while killing socialists. In 1921 Italian Fascists attacked existing left-wing autarkic projects at the behest of large landowners, destroying roughly 119 labor chambers, 107 cooperatives and 83 peasant offices that year alone.[26] Nazi Germany under economics minister Hjalmar Schacht claimed to strive for self-sufficiency but pursued major international trade, albeit under a different system, to escape the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, satisfy business elites and prepare for genocide. The regime would continue to conduct trade, including with countries like the United States, including connections with major companies like IBM and Coca-Cola.[27]

After World War II

Economic self-sufficiency was pursued as a goal by some members of the Non-Aligned Movement, such as India under Jawaharlal Nehru[28] and Tanzania,[29] under the ideology of Ujamaa[30] and Swadeshi. That was partly an effort to escape the economic domination of both the United States and the Soviet Union while modernizing the countries’ infrastructure.

Small-scale autarkies were sometimes used by the Civil Rights Movement, such as in the case of the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Boycotters set up their own self-sufficient system of cheap or free transit to allow black residents to get to work and avoid using the then-segregated public systems in a successful effort to bring political pressure.

After World War II, Autonomist efforts in Europe embraced local autarkic projects in an effort to craft anti-authoritarian left-wing spaces, especially influencing the social center and squatters’ rights movements. Such efforts remain a common feature of Autonomist and anarchist movements on the continent today. The Micropolis social centre in Greece, for example, has gyms, restaurants, bars, meeting space and free distribution of food and resources.[31]

Around 1970, the Black Panther Party moved away from communist internationalism towards “intercommunalism,” a term coined[32] by Huey P. Newton, “to retain a grasp on the local when the rest of radical thought seemed to be moving global.” Intercommunalism drew[33] from left-wing autarkic projects like free medical clinics and breakfast programs, “explicitly articulated as attempts to fill a void left by the failure of the federal government to provide resources as basic as food to black communities.”

Autarkic efforts to counter the forcible privatization of public resources and maintain local self-sufficiency also formed a key part of alter-globalization efforts. The Cochabamba Water War had Bolivians successfully oppose the privatization of their water system to keep the resource in public hands.[34]


Today, national economic autarkies are relatively rare. A commonly-cited example is North Korea, based on the government ideology of Juche (self-reliance), which is concerned with maintaining its domestic localized economy in the face of its isolation. However, even North Korea has extensive trade with Russia, China, Syria, Iran, Vietnam, India and many countries in Europe and Africa. North Korea had to import food during a widespread famine in the 1990s.

A better modern example at a societal level is the autonomous region of Rojava, the autonomous northern region of Syria. Largely cut off from international trade, facing multiple enemies, and striving for a society based on democratic confederalism and the ideals of Murray Bookchin (who repeatedly referenced the Greek ideal of autarkeia as an essential part[35] of the history of leftist efforts for local liberation) Rojava’s government and constitution emphasize economic self-sufficiency[36] directed by neighborhood and village councils. Under changes made in 2012 property and business belong to those who live in or use it towards that goal, while infrastructure, land and major resources are commons run by local and regional councils.

An example of a contemporary effort at localized autarky, incorporating the concept’s history from black nationalism, Ujamaa, African-American socialism and the civil rights movement, is Cooperation Jackson,[37] a movement aimed at creating a self-sufficient black working class economy in Jackson, Mississippi. The movement has aimed[38] to secure land and build self-sufficient cooperatives and workplaces “to democratically transform the political economy of the city” and push back against gentrification. Cooperation Jackson also saw a gain in electoral political power when its involvement proved pivotal to the 2013 mayoral election of Chokwe Lumumba and the 2017 election of his son, Chokwe Antar Lumumba.

Support and opposition

Local autarky

  • Anarcho-Primitivism
  • Commune
  • Civil rights movement
  • Green Anarchism
  • Kibbutz Movement
  • Mutualist movement
  • Survivalism
  • Traditionalist conservatism
  • Transition town
  • Urban homesteading and Integral Urban House
  • Utopian socialism

Societal autarky


  • Anarchist communism
  • Anarcho-syndicalism
  • Autonomism
  • Business nationalism
  • Collectivist anarchism
  • Council communism
  • De Leonism
  • Democratic Confederalism
  • Juche
  • Khmer Rouge
  • Mutualism (economic theory)
  • Neo-corporatism
  • Paleoconservatism
  • Populism
  • Producerism
  • Social corporatism
  • Solidarity economy
  • Solidarity unionism
  • State capitalism
  • Swadeshi
  • Syndicalism
  • Ujamaa


  • Anarcho-capitalism
  • Classical liberalism
  • Commercial Revolution
  • Fourth International
  • Liberal internationalism
  • Libertarian conservatism
  • Libertarianism
  • Neoconservatism
  • Neoliberalism
  • Permanent revolution
  • Proletarian internationalism
  • Stateless communism
  • Trotskyism
  • World communism
  • World revolution

Macroeconomic theory


  • Alexander Hamilton
  • Alter-globalization
  • Anti-globalization movement
  • Murray Bookchin
  • Celso Furtado
  • Core-periphery model
  • Friedrich List
  • Global justice movement
  • Hans Singer
  • Import Substitution Industrialization
  • Infant industry argument
  • Mercantilism
  • Nationalization
  • Protectionism
  • Raúl Prebisch
  • Singer-Prebisch thesis
  • Structuralist economics


  • Andre Gorz[39]
  • Austrian School of Economics
  • Economic liberalism
  • Free trade agreement
  • Free trade
  • Globalization
  • Milton Friedman
  • Neoclassical economics
  • Privatization

Relevant microeconomic theory

  • Fundamental theorems of welfare economics
  • Robinson Crusoe economy


  1. ^Glossary of International Economics Archived 2007-12-12 at the Wayback Machine.
  2. ^Van Oudenaren, John (1991). “7: Economics”. Détente in Europe: The Soviet Union and the West Since 1953. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 255. ISBN 9780822311416. Retrieved 28 Mar 2019. After veering toward autarky under war communism, in the 1920s the Soviet authorities began restoring business relations with traditional partners.
  3. ^Hettne, Björn (1993). “The concept of neo-mercantilism”. In Magnusson, Lars (ed.). Mercantilist Economics. Recent Economic Thought. 33. New York: Springer Science & Business Media (published 2012). p. 237. ISBN 9789401114080. Retrieved 28 Mar 2019. The protection of the nation-state, as far as economic processes are concerned, is often seen as the essence of mercantilism. In this perspective autarky is the extreme mercantilist position.
  4. ^De Grand, Alexander J. (2000) [1938]. Italian fascism : its origins & development (3rd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0803266223. OCLC 42462895.
  5. ^Leval, Gastón,. Collectives in the Spanish Revolution. Richards, Vernon,. Oakland, CA. ISBN 978-1-62963-501-9. OCLC 1042329362.
  6. ^Edwin, Black (2001). IBM and the Holocaust : the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America’s most powerful corporation (1st ed.). New York: Crown Publishers. ISBN 978-0609607992. OCLC 45896166.
  7. ^Paxton, Robert O. (2005). The anatomy of fascism (1st Vintage books ed.). New York: Vintage Books. ISBN 978-1400033911. OCLC 58452991.
  8. ^“Archived copy” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-01-20. Retrieved 2014-01-18.
  9. ^Mansfield, Edward D.; Pollins, Brian M., eds. (2009-09-15). “Computer Simulations of International Trade and Conflict”. Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate: 333. ISBN 978-0472022939.
  10. ^Judt, Tony (2011-05-01). Socialism in Provence, 1871–1914. p. 263. ISBN 9780814743553.
  11. ^Mossé, Claude (1969). The ancient world at work. New York: Norton. pp. 27–28. ISBN 978-0393053982. OCLC 66672.
  12. ^Bookchin, Murray (2017). Urbanization without cities : the rise and decline of citizenship. Montréal. pp. 105–108. ISBN 9781551646237. OCLC 1046676911.
  13. ^, Graeber (2011). Debt : the first 5,000 years. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Melville House. ISBN 978-1612191294. OCLC 426794447.
  14. ^, Huang (1981). 1587, a year of no significance : the Ming dynasty in decline. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300025181. OCLC 6280586.
  15. ^Hucker, Charles O. (1970). The traditional Chinese state in Ming times (1368-1644). Tucson: University of Arizona Press. ISBN 0816500932. OCLC 906066347.
  16. ^, Cecelski, David. The waterman’s song : slavery and freedom in maritime North Carolina. Chapel Hill. pp. 128–130. ISBN 9781469602356. OCLC 605086965.
  17. ^, Cecelski, David. The waterman’s song : slavery and freedom in maritime North Carolina. Chapel Hill. pp. 179–201. ISBN 9781469602356. OCLC 605086965.
  18. ^, Cecelski, David. The fire of freedom : Abraham Galloway and the slaves’ Civil War. Chapel Hill. ISBN 1469621908. OCLC 900011294.
  19. ^, Goodwyn (1978-03-29). The Populist moment : a short history of the agrarian revolt in America. New York. ISBN 978-0195024173. OCLC 3650099.
  20. ^Tuchman, Barbara W. (2012). The Guns of August: The proud tower. MacMillan, Margaret. New York, NY: Library of America. p. 1046. ISBN 978-1598531459. OCLC 731911132.
  21. ^, Scott, James (1998). Seeing like a state : how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300070163. OCLC 37392803.
  22. ^De Cleyre, Voltairine, 1866-1912. The selected works of Voltairine de Cleyre : poems, essays, sketches and stories, 1885-1911. Berkman, Alexander, 1870-1936,, Havel, Hippolyte. Chico, CA. ISBN 1-84935-256-9. OCLC 938996661.
  23. ^, Lincoln, W. (1999). Red victory : a history of the Russian Civil War (1st Da Capo Press ed.). New York: Da Capo. ISBN 978-0306809095. OCLC 40510540.
  24. ^Lewin, Moshe (1994). The making of the Soviet system : essays in the social history of interwar Russia. New York: New Press. ISBN 978-1565841253. OCLC 30841557.
  25. ^Abel, Paz (June 2011). Story of the iron column : militant anarchism in the Spanish Civil War. Sharkey, Paul. Oakland, California. p. 170. ISBN 9781849350655. OCLC 896845543.
  26. ^De Grand, Alexander J. (2000). Italian fascism : its origins & development (3rd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 31–33. ISBN 978-0803266223. OCLC 42462895.
  27. ^Black, Edwin. (2001). IBM and the Holocaust : the strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America’s most powerful corporation (1st ed.). New York: Crown Publishers. ISBN 0-609-60799-5. OCLC 45896166.
  28. ^NAYAR, BALDEV RAJ (1997). “Nationalist Planning for Autarky and State Hegemony : Development Strategy Under Nehru”. Indian Economic Review. 32 (1): 13–38. JSTOR 24010467.
  29. ^Malima, Kighoma A. (1979). “Planning for Self-Reliance Tanzania’s Third Five Year Development Plan”. Africa Development. 4 (1): 37–56. JSTOR 24498250.
  30. ^, Blommaert (2014). State Ideology and Language in Tanzania : Second and Revised Edition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780748668267. OCLC 1024254210.
  31. ^activist), Bray, Mark (Political (2017). Antifa : the anti-fascist handbook. Brooklyn, NY. ISBN 978-1612197036. OCLC 984595655.
  32. ^“Huey Newton introduces Revolutionary Intercommunalism, Boston College, November 18 1970”. Retrieved 2018-05-12.
  33. ^“The Havoc of Less”. The New Inquiry. 2017-09-15. Archived from the original on 2018-02-06. Retrieved 2018-02-06.
  34. ^, Olivera (2004). Cochabamba!: Water War in Bolivia. Lewis, Tom. Cambridge, Massachusetts: South End Press. ISBN 9780896087026. OCLC 56194844.
  35. ^Bookchin, Murray. Urbanization without cities : the rise and decline of citizenship. Montréal. ISBN 9781551646237. OCLC 1046676911.
  36. ^Strangers In A Tangled Wilderness, ed. (2015). A small key can open a large door: the Rojava revolution. United States. ISBN 978-1938660177. OCLC 900796070.
  37. ^“Welcome”. Cooperation Jackson. Retrieved 2018-07-15.
  38. ^Akuno, Kali; Nangwaya, Ajamu (2017). Jackson rising : the struggle for economic recovery and black self-determination in Jackson, Mississippi. Nangwaya, Ajamu,, Cooperation Jackson. Montreal, Quebec. ISBN 9780995347458. OCLC 976416348.
  39. ^Gorz, Andre. “Towards a Dual Society.” Adieux au proletariat, translated by Mike Sonenscher, Pluto Press London, 1982. pp. 102-103.


Ofer Abarbanel online library